Guantánamo ‘a vision of hell, beyond Orwell, beyond Kafka’
Guantánamo ‘a vision of hell, beyond Orwell, beyond Kafka’
)

Mohamedou Ould Slahi, a 45-year-old Mauritanian man, has been imprisoned in Guantánamo Bay since 2002. He wrote a memoir, Guantánamo Diary, in 2005, but it remained classified by the US military until 2013, before being edited by Larry Siems and published this year by Little, Brown and Company. It is the first work to be released by someone still interned in the camp.

Cliff Conner teaches history at the City University of New York Graduate Center. He is the author of A people’s history of science and Jean Paul Marat: tribune of the French revolution. Here he reviews for Red Flag the recently-released book.

----------

This is a book I initially did not want to read. I am not hypersensitive but the recent official US Senate report admitting and detailing CIA torture practices nauseated me to the point that I felt incapable of further outrage. Nonetheless, the more I heard about Mohamedou Ould Slahi’s Guantánamo Diary, the more I wanted to read it. Glenn Greenwald said: “Every American with a shred of conscience” should read it now, and I agree. The ongoing crime against humanity it exposes – representative of so many others like it – is being carried out in the name of the American people.

I first learned of the book’s existence from an Op-Ed article in the January 19 New York Times. Then it was featured on the front page of the following Sunday’s New York Times Book Review. Both said that Guantánamo Diary should not be thought of merely as a horror story of unspeakable abuse, because the author’s own undiminished humanity offsets the inhumanity of his captors. Again, I agree. Against all odds, Slahi has even managed to preserve a sense of humour that often shines through in his narrative.

That is not to say that what he has to say is not deeply disturbing. My advice is that you not read it just before going to bed because it may cause nightmares. While the remarkable matter-of-factness with which Slahi describes his ordeal makes it somewhat easier to digest, what he has gone through has been at least as Kafkaesque as anything Franz Kafka could have imagined. (John le Carré has described the book as “a vision of hell, beyond Orwell, beyond Kafka”.)

Guantánamo Diary reminded me of books and movies like Twelve Years a Slave, which can outrage and depress you by putting extreme injustices “in your face”, so to speak. But there’s one important difference: Twelve Years a Slave is about atrocities that occurred more than a century ago. The victims and the perpetrators are long dead.

But Mohamedou Ould Slahi is still imprisoned at Guantánamo Bay to this very day! In 2010 US District Court Judge James Robertson ordered his release, but the Obama administration appealed the ruling, and so Slahi’s seemingly endless ordeal continues. Yes, that’s the same Obama administration that gained office on a promise to shut down the Guantánamo prison.

Another extraordinary aspect of this work is that Slahi spoke no English before he arrived as a captive at Guantánamo. He made an effort to learn it so that he could interact directly with his interrogators without having to rely on untrustworthy translators. The English he picked up is so colloquial that he even uses “like” to mean “said” – as young Americans frequently do (“I was like ‘how are you?’ and he was like ‘I’m OK’.”).

Slahi produced his handwritten narrative in an isolation cell during the summer of 2005. He then tried for six years to get it published, but as a War on Terror prisoner with few legal rights or protections, he could not have accomplished that without outside help. Instrumental in bringing it into the light of day was author and human rights activist Larry Siems, who has brilliantly edited Slahi’s document. Siems, by the way, has also produced the best account of the aforementioned Senate report, The torture report: what the documents say about America’s post-9/11 torture program.

One salient feature of Slahi’s text is how much of it is missing, and how obvious its absence is. On almost every page there are blacked-out words, phrases, sentences, and paragraphs. Sometimes there are even multipage runs entirely blacked out. The current euphemism for this practice is “redaction,” a word that used to be a simple synonym for editing, but which now has taken on the connotation of censorship.

The book’s more-than-2,500 black-bar redactions were the work of US military and espionage agency censors, all in the name of “national security”. Slahi himself suspected that the censorship was designed less to protect Americans from terrorism than to protect interrogators and their bosses from prosecution for war crimes, and he is surely correct in that supposition. Among Siems’ editorial contributions to the book are footnotes he added to fill in at least some of the blanks with information gleaned from Freedom of Information Act documents obtained by the ACLU.

Here is Mohamedou Ould Slahi’s story in a nutshell, with euphemisms in quotation marks: In November 2001 he left his home in Mauritania and voluntarily submitted to questioning by Mauritanian “intelligence” agents acting at the behest of US security authorities. He never saw his home or family again.

The Mauritanians interrogated him for a week before turning him over to US agents for “extraordinary rendition” to a “black site” in Jordan, where he experienced Donald Rumsfeld’s “enhanced interrogation methods”. That lasted eight months. From there he was flown to the notorious torture prison at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan for two more weeks of “softening up” before finally being flown to Guantánamo, where he has been held ever since.

Over the years that are covered in the Diary, he was subjected to alternating periods of intense torture and less intense forms of interrogation, but the latter also involved a great deal of isolation, abuse, and constant terror in the form of never knowing what was coming next. And how did he manage to find any humour in this? His experience has been filled with so many irrational absurdities perpetrated by so many dimwits that it would be hilarious … if only it were not so horrifying.

Guantánamo Diary presents us with yet another indication of how far the rule of law has been eroded in the post-9/11 United States. No matter how much you think you know about the criminality of what goes on at places like Guantánamo Bay and the black sites, you can still learn a great deal from Mohamedou Ould Slahi. And then you should use that knowledge as motivation for organising to demand the unconditional release of all who are held captive there.

Read more
NSW teachers strike to end pay cap
A New South Wales Teachers Federation member

“On the day of my mother’s funeral, I went home and wrote reports”, Kate says. She’s a public high school teacher and, along with 50,000 others, many also from Catholic schools, she’s striking to demand better pay and reduced workloads from the New South Wales government.

NSW nurses reject pay cut
A NSW Nurses and Midwives’ Association member

Nurses and midwives in New South Wales have rejected the state government’s insulting offer of a 3 percent pay rise in a combative, all-membership meeting at Sydney’s Town Hall. 

The racist disgrace of the Northern Territory Intervention
NT Intervention a racist disgrace
Kim Bullimore

Fifteen years ago, the John Howard federal Coalition government launched a military invasion and occupation of Aboriginal townships and lands in the Northern Territory. More than 600 military and police personnel, accompanied by a phalanx of government bureaucrats, entered 73 Aboriginal communities, placing them under the unilateral control of the Australian army.

Roe vs. Wade overturned: a hammer blow against women’s rights
Fight the US Supreme Court
Liz Ross

Around the US, tens of thousands have hit the streets slamming the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe vs. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision that established abortion as a right. In Manhattan, a large crowd of young, multiracial activists marched, chanting “Fuck the Supreme Court!”

‘Pregnant? Need help? Call Jane’
Shirley Killen

In the late 1960s, cryptic notes began to appear on poles and noticeboards around Chicago, directing women who were pregnant and in trouble to “call Jane”. The number provided connected them to the Jane Collective (officially the Abortion Counselling Service of Women’s Liberation), an underground network of activists providing illegal abortions in the years before the 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision. This collective is the subject of The Janes, a new HBO documentary directed by Emma Pildes and Tia Lessin.

Voice to parliament will do little
Jordan Humphreys

Anthony Albanese started his victory speech on election night with a commitment that his government would implement the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full, beginning with a referendum to create an Indigenous Voice to Parliament in its first term.