The University of Melbourne Student Union has taken an important stand in support of protest rights, condemning the victimisation of student protesters by university management and Victoria Police.
On 4 August, the union’s student council passed a motion “[opposing] Victoria Police’s crackdown on activists protesting the bigoted Liberals behind the Menzies Institute” and committed $500 “as a contribution towards the students’ fines and as an expression of solidarity”.
This comes after several students received fines totalling more than $3,000 for alleged “riotous behaviour” during an impromptu protest in March against the Robert Menzies Institute. In a move that marks a dangerous precedent for collaboration between university management and Victoria Police, activists believe that management singled out individual students and forwarded their details to the police.
The Robert Menzies Institute is a Liberal Party think tank that opened on campus in November 2021. Although pitched as “non-partisan”, its board is stacked with Liberal Party luminaries like Peta Credlin, Georgina Downer and David Kemp, and it was bankrolled by the former Liberal federal government to the tune of $7 million. Its purpose is to sanitise and celebrate the reactionary legacy of Liberal Party architect Robert Menzies.
Students have protested the Menzies Institute from the outset and built a widely popular activist campaign against it, endorsed by the undergraduate student union, the Graduate Student Association and the National Tertiary Education Union. In doing so, they have stood in the best tradition of radical student unionism, whether Melbourne University students turning their union building into a refuge for draft dodgers opposed to the Vietnam War or University of New South Wales students protesting against the college on their campus of Opus Dei, which financed fascist regimes in Spain and Chile.
Management at Melbourne University willingly worked with Liberal Party figures to set up the Menzies Institute. For them, the Liberal Party is just another private bidder for university property and intellectual clout, along with large weapons manufacturers like Lockheed Martin, from which management accepted $13 billion in 2016 to open a research centre for the development of military technology.
Partnerships like these with big corporations and their parliamentary servants reveal the hypocrisy of Melbourne University’s progressive facade. For all that management boasts about its commitment to reconciliation with Indigenous people, this has not stopped it from opening a shrine to a ruling-class racist in cooperation with conservative culture warriors like Peta Credlin.
University management’s likely collaboration with Victoria Police demonstrates just how committed it is to working with reactionaries and repressing dissent. Staff and students were given no opportunity to object to the institute, the university negotiating it through backroom deals with the Liberal Party. Now, by voluntarily revealing the details of some protesters to the police, university management is seeking to intimidate students from expressing their collective political opposition in the best way available to them: through protest.
Protest everywhere is increasingly under attack. New South Wales recently introduced a bill that threatens protesters with up to $20,000 in fines and up to two years’ prison time for blocking traffic or marching on roads. Meanwhile, the Labor government in Victoria has also passed its own anti-protest laws designed to prevent climate activists from obstructing the destruction of native forests.
In the face of these new anti-protest laws, the decision of student unions to take a stand in support of protest rights is particularly important. Attacks on protesters at any level, including on campus, should be opposed as a necessary part of combating the injustices of the state and the system it serves.
There has been a vigorous argument over the direction of the National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU) industrial campaign at Sydney University this year. Most recently, those who have been reluctant to argue and organise seriously for frequent enough and long enough strikes are now leading the charge for a “smarter” strategy of administration bans.
In late August, around 50 union members at Knauf plasterboard held a meeting in their Melbourne factory to discuss recent EBA negotiations, which had begun a few months earlier. A new HR manager insisted on attending the meeting and wasted people’s time explaining the wonderful job that company management had done taking care of the workers, in particular their recent and significant safety concerns. As he spoke, one after another the workers turned their backs on him. Soon, they began challenging the manager about a worker who had just been sacked.
Minoo Jalali was among those who resisted Ayatollah Khomeini’s rise to power in Iran. In the early months of 1979, she joined a mass women’s protest against the compulsory wearing of the hijab in public. “That revolution was inevitable”, Jalali recounted 40 years later in an interview with the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. “Nobody could have really stopped the force of it. We hoped that we could steer it [but] we were wrong. And the clergy hijacked it ... and deceived many people.”
Protests and riots have spread across Iran after a 22-year-old Kurdish woman, Mahsa Amini, was murdered by the morality police. Amini was visiting the capital, Tehran, on 13 September when she was arrested for allegedly breaking mandatory veiling laws. Police beat her into a coma and she died three days later. Amini was buried in her hometown of Saqqez.
The international working-class movement has long been divided between two strategies to win socialism: the reformist and the revolutionary.
Revolutionary Marxists argue that socialism is possible only if the working class leads a revolution. So why organise among students?