Four changes that would do more for free speech than watering down 18C
Four changes that would do more for free speech than watering down 18C
)

While the Liberal backbenchers work themselves into a tizz over section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, Red Flag has put together a short list of things the government could do tomorrow if it were serious about protecting free speech.

  1. Repeal secrecy laws that make it illegal for workers in Australia’s offshore detention regime to speak publicly about what they witness. Since 2015, the Australian Border Force Act has imposed a mandatory two-year jail term on any person found guilty of breaching its sweeping secrecy provisions. After a concerted campaign in 2016, an exemption was created for health workers, but social workers, teachers or guards who speak out can expect a stint in jail. 
  2. Remove “gag clauses” that ban publicly funded organisations from criticising the government or advocating law or policy reform. Since 2014, the federal government has used funding agreements with the community legal sector to prohibit advocacy. Similar restrictions are imposed on many other community organisations. The intent is to silence bodies that historically have been vocal in opposing government attacks.
  3. Scrap the federal building code and the Australian Building and Construction Commission that enforces it. Under the code, it is unlawful for construction workers to identify themselves publicly as union members. In particular, clause 13 of the code provides that an employer must ensure that “building association [union] logos, mottos or indicia are not applied to clothing, property or equipment”. Numerous other clauses have the combined effect of denying workers the right to organise freely in unions.
  4. Enshrine the right to protest. Australian governments do not consistently recognise that engaging in public protest is a right. Authorities reserve their powers to restrict and ban public displays of dissent. Currently, NSW, Tasmania and Western Australia have harsh anti-protest laws on the books, which empower police to shut down protests that hinder certain economic interests and require courts to mete out hefty punishments to those involved. Across the country, it is unlawful for workers to protest by picketing their workplaces. Under the Fair Work Act, workers can be hit with large fines if they strike in support of another group of workers or over a political issue.

Of course, none of this will happen, because the government is aiming not to protect free speech but to promote hate speech. Sad.

Read more
NSW teachers strike to end pay cap
A New South Wales Teachers Federation member

“On the day of my mother’s funeral, I went home and wrote reports”, Kate says. She’s a public high school teacher and, along with 50,000 others, many also from Catholic schools, she’s striking to demand better pay and reduced workloads from the New South Wales government.

NSW nurses reject pay cut
A NSW Nurses and Midwives’ Association member

Nurses and midwives in New South Wales have rejected the state government’s insulting offer of a 3 percent pay rise in a combative, all-membership meeting at Sydney’s Town Hall. 

The racist disgrace of the Northern Territory Intervention
NT Intervention a racist disgrace
Kim Bullimore

Fifteen years ago, the John Howard federal Coalition government launched a military invasion and occupation of Aboriginal townships and lands in the Northern Territory. More than 600 military and police personnel, accompanied by a phalanx of government bureaucrats, entered 73 Aboriginal communities, placing them under the unilateral control of the Australian army.

Roe vs. Wade overturned: a hammer blow against women’s rights
Fight the US Supreme Court
Liz Ross

Around the US, tens of thousands have hit the streets slamming the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe vs. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision that established abortion as a right. In Manhattan, a large crowd of young, multiracial activists marched, chanting “Fuck the Supreme Court!”

‘Pregnant? Need help? Call Jane’
Shirley Killen

In the late 1960s, cryptic notes began to appear on poles and noticeboards around Chicago, directing women who were pregnant and in trouble to “call Jane”. The number provided connected them to the Jane Collective (officially the Abortion Counselling Service of Women’s Liberation), an underground network of activists providing illegal abortions in the years before the 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision. This collective is the subject of The Janes, a new HBO documentary directed by Emma Pildes and Tia Lessin.

Voice to parliament will do little
Jordan Humphreys

Anthony Albanese started his victory speech on election night with a commitment that his government would implement the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full, beginning with a referendum to create an Indigenous Voice to Parliament in its first term.