Australia, US facilitate Saudi war crimes in Yemen
Australia, US facilitate Saudi war crimes in Yemen

The Saudi-led war on Yemen has devastated a country already crippled by widespread poverty and systematic neglect. 

In 2015, Saudi Arabia and its allies launched what has become a vicious, unrelenting assault on a defenceless population. Their goal is to defeat the Houthi rebels, who have refused to back the puppet government installed by the Saudis in 2011. 

Despite tens of thousands of air strikes and a debilitating air and naval blockade, they have failed to dislodge the rebels from the capital, Sanaa. Indeed, the Houthis now control large parts of the country. 

Often cynically portrayed as Iranian puppets, the Houthis receive far less support than is generally assumed. And their movement is motivated less by love for the ayatollahs than by longstanding socio-economic grievances with successive Saudi-backed dictators, and their exclusion from a transitional government established after the 2011 revolution. 

This inconvenient truth was ignored by the Saudi regime, which exaggerated the risk posed by a supposed Iranian proxy on its doorstep to justify a massive military intervention. As a result, Yemen now faces the largest humanitarian emergency on the planet. 

Fourteen million people are at risk of starving to death, according to a World Food Programme report. It is the most severe famine anywhere in the world for more than 100 years. Sixteen million lack access to clean water, and a staggering 22 million people – 75 percent of the population – rely on aid. 

The United Nations estimates that more than 3 million Yemenis have fled their homes, desperately seeking safety and security. Many now live in makeshift refugee camps, their weathered tents the only signs of life in an otherwise inhospitable landscape. 

To force the Houthi rebels to surrender, the Saudis have repeatedly attacked and closed the port of Hodeida, which handled 70 percent of food imports prior to the war. They have tried to bully NGOs to stop aid programs in rebel-controlled regions. When persuasion has failed, they’ve used violence. Hospitals run by Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders) have been bombed many times. 

Save the Children, an international human rights organisation, estimates that 50,000 children died from poverty-related causes last year. That’s 137 pairs of smiling eyes left vacant each day; a final, bitter familial embrace every 10 minutes. 

The country’s social divisions – communal, cultural and religious – are becoming canyon-like with the geographical carve-up. The Houthis control the north and central regions, al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula controls the south-east, and forces loyal to the United Arab Emirates control the area surrounding the strategically vital port of Aden – they are considering unilateral secession from the north. 

In truth, “Yemen” no longer exists. Emaciated by decades of underinvestment, ruling class corruption and neoliberal attacks, the country has received a knockout blow from the Saudis and their allies. 

This calamity is an indictment of the so-called global order. In particular, it is an indictment of the US and British governments, which have expanded their military sales to the Saudis: an example of the barbaric bipartisanship often displayed on issues of imperial foreign policy by Democrats and Republicans and by social democrats and conservatives. 

A bomb that killed 40 children on a school bus in August was almost certainly produced in Texas by Lockheed Martin. Not satisfied with facilitating indiscriminate murder in this way, the West has provided secondary support, including intelligence on possible targets, in-air refuelling for bombing campaigns and an endless stream of high-end military equipment. 

A report by UN investigators found evidence of mass murder, torture and rape of civilians. Yet, when confronted with the facts, US secretary of defense Jim Mattis insisted that murdering thousands of unarmed Yemeni civilians was an act of self-defence by the Saudi and Emirati monarchies. Secretary of state Mike Pompeo was more honest in a congressional memo that justified the Saudi-led intervention in terms of curtailing Iranian influence. 

The Australian government has been similarly complicit. Earlier this year, independent news site New Matilda reported that licences for the sale of military equipment to the Saudis have recently quadrupled. Christopher Pyne, minister for defence industry from 2016 and now minister for defence, and other government ministers have engaged in high level talks regarding the expansion of the Royal Saudi Navy. 

Further, it was revealed last year that Australian warships have been conducting joint exercises with the Saudis – i.e. with the navy that is blocking desperately needed aid to 22 million civilians. To top it all off, a former Australian Army major-general, Mike Hindmarsh, has been leading the Emirates’ fighting forces. His reward is reportedly a $500,000 annual salary. One can only imagine the hysteria if the Iranians or the Palestinians were paying his wages. But in this case, he has received no criticism or censure from the government or the mainstream media in Australia.

Almost 30 million Yemenis are suffering a brutal military siege. It is well past time that the Australia ended its relationship with the despicable Saudi regime and ended its involvement with war crimes.

Read more
Uni staff push for real wage rise
Alma Torlakovic

Universities around the country are entering enterprise bargaining negotiations and there’s a debate about what the National Tertiary Education Union’s wage claim should be. 

Julian Assange needs public support
Josh Lees

UK Home Secretary Priti Patel has approved the extradition of Julian Assange to the US, where he will face 18 espionage charges brought against him by the Department of Justice. The charges carry a combined penalty of up to 175 years in prison. It is another cut in the long, torturous crucifixion of the Wikileaks founder, who dared to embarrass and expose the war crimes of the US empire and its allies.

Colombia elects first leftist president, rejecting traditional politicians
Colombia’s first leftist president
Tom Sullivan

It has been generations in the making but, on 19 June, the first ever leftist president of Colombia was elected. Gustavo Petro defeated his right-wing opponent, Rodolfo Hernández, in a second-round run-off with 50.4 percent of the vote against 47.3 percent. The traditional conservative and centre-left coalitions were both defeated in the first round, winning 24 percent and 4 percent of the vote respectively.

'Fair Work' hands out a pay cut
'Fair Work' hands out a pay cut
Jerome Small

There’s plenty to be said about the outcome of the Fair Work Commission’s annual wage review—but the widespread claims of a “union win” fall flat. After all, for most workers affected by this week’s FWC decision, the result will be a cut to real wages.

A refugee win, but fight continues
Oscar Sterner

The refugee campaign won a major victory this week, as Tamil refugees Priya and Nades Nadesalingam and their two young children finally arrived home to the Queensland town of Biloela.

On fossil fuels and living costs
James Plested

For decades the right in Australia and around the world have argued that any serious shift away from fossil fuels would, in addition to massive job losses, result in a punishing rise in living costs. This has, perhaps, been their single most effective piece of propaganda—one that positions them as the champions of workers and the poor who will be most impacted by increases in the price of electricity and other essential goods and services.