The courage of Chelsea Manning
The courage of Chelsea Manning

In films, heroes are thanked by the police and rewarded with wreaths or keys to the city. Real life heroes are more likely to be in prison. Since March last year, that is where Chelsea Manning has been.

Manning was originally imprisoned from 2010 until 2017 for leaking files documenting US war crimes in Iraq that she had accessed in her role as a US intelligence analyst. The material that Manning put into the public sphere – from the video of a US helicopter attack that killed 12 civilians in Baghdad in 2007, to the documents verifying the torture of Iraqis, to the field reports revealing a staggering 109,000 violent deaths in Iraq between 2004 and 2007 (including 66,081 “non-combatants”) – the “Iraq War Logs” provided stunning proof of the true horror of the Iraq war.

For this service to humanity, for demonstrating to the world the true nature of US imperialism, Manning was thrown into a military prison at Quantico, Virginia. Before even being charged, she was put into solitary confinement and was under constant surveillance. Investigative journalist Glenn Greenwald wrote that Manning was being imprisoned “under conditions that constitute cruel and inhumane treatment and, by the standards of many nations, even torture”.

In 2013 she was finally found guilty of violating the Espionage Act and was sentenced to 35 years in the Fort Leavenworth prison in Kansas. When she went on hunger strike, protesting the prison authorities’ refusal to allow her access to hormone treatment to transition from male to female, they put her under even more intense surveillance. Manning described how:

“For 17 hours a day, I sat directly in front of at least two Marine Corps guards seated behind a one-way mirror. I was not allowed to lay down. I was not allowed to lean my back against the cell wall. I was not allowed to exercise. Sometimes, to keep from going crazy, I would stand up, walk around, or dance, as ‘dancing’ was not considered exercise by the Marine Corps.”

At the very end of his term, Barack Obama commuted Manning’s sentence, and she was finally released in 2017. But after only two years of freedom, she is now back in jail.

In March 2019, Manning was ordered to testify before a grand jury against Julian Assange. Assange was Manning’s publisher: he released the leaked material on Wikileaks, and he is currently rotting in HM Belmarsh prison in Britain, charged with espionage and computer hacking for that act.

Manning could have decided to testify against Assange, to grant herself a life in freedom after spending almost her entire adult life in detention. Instead, she told the court, “in solidarity with many activists facing the odds, I will stand by my principles. I will exhaust every legal remedy available” to avoid testifying.

Manning was briefly released in May, when the grand jury’s term expired – but she was immediately subpoenaed to testify before a new grand jury. She told the judge that she would rather “starve to death” than give evidence. She is now in prison until either she decides to give evidence, or the grand jury’s term expires in November 2021. Unless she is subpoenaed again.

US District Court judge Anthony Trenga said he hoped that while she’s locked in the Alexandria jail, “Ms Manning would reflect on the principles she says she’s embracing ... and whether those views are worth the price she’s paying for them”. The statement reflects how hopelessly naive Trenga is, alongside the rest of his cronies in the state machine that is trying to break her. They can’t understand the fire Chelsea is given every day by her righteous opposition to human degradation and suffering. Their grotesque and twisted view of humanity cuts them off from understanding her determination to fight for it.

On top of imprisonment, Manning faces coercive fines that increase in severity as time goes on in a further attempt to force her to testify. In November the United Nations special rapporteur on torture denounced her treatment as amounting to torture. She responded in a letter stating, “My long-standing objection to the immoral practice of throwing people in jail without charge or trial, for the sole purpose of forcing them to testify before a secret, government-run investigative panel, remains strong.

“I am thrilled to see the practice of coercive confinement called out for what it is: incompatible with international human rights standards. Regardless, even knowing I am very likely to stay in jail for an even longer time, I’m never backing down.”

When Manning, as a 22-year-old intelligence analyst for the US military, made her original decision to leak a dossier of files documenting the realities of the war on terror in 2010, she was not naive about the potential consequences. She knew the repressive might of the US state could crash down upon her at any moment. She had seen what it was capable of, having spent hours watching US soldiers murdering innocent Iraqis with machine guns from helicopters. She knew of Guantánamo and Abu Ghraib, of the torture regularly meted out to prisoners. She knew that she could face a death sentence. And yet still she decided to leak.

That was the first time. This time, though, she knew more. When she made the decision to refuse to testify, Manning knew first-hand the degrading, soul-numbing reality of life in prison. And yet still she did it, and she has woken up every day since in her cell and decided to keep doing it.

In his novel Catch 22, Joseph Heller wrote, “They have the right to do anything we can’t stop them from doing”. We couldn’t stop the murder of more than 182,000 Iraqi civilians killed by the war on terror between 2003 and 2018. We couldn’t stop the torture inflicted on the thousands of Iraqi civilians who were picked up by US military sweeps at checkpoints and shut in 12 foot by 12 foot cells in Abu Ghraib.

But of any individual in the West, Chelsea Manning has done the most to fight against all of the torture, all of the murders, all of the lies of the occupation. She found a crack in the armour of the US military: her own humanity. She pushed it open until it was a wide enough that the world could see into the realities of the war, and she fuelled opposition to militarism by millions.

Chelsea Manning’s imprisonment serves as a reminder of the lengths to which capitalist states will go to commit murder and keep it out of the public eye, to punish anyone who exposes or fights it. But her heroic ongoing refusal to testify serves as a lesson. The history of war is also the history of heroic resistance to war.

Read more
Julian Assange needs public support
Josh Lees

UK Home Secretary Priti Patel has approved the extradition of Julian Assange to the US, where he will face 18 espionage charges brought against him by the Department of Justice. The charges carry a combined penalty of up to 175 years in prison. It is another cut in the long, torturous crucifixion of the Wikileaks founder, who dared to embarrass and expose the war crimes of the US empire and its allies.

Israel's ethnic cleansing continues
Kim Bullimore

The Israeli High Court has approved the expulsion of between 1,200 and 1,800 Palestinians from eight villages in the Masafer Yatta region of the South Hebron Hills in the occupied West Bank. Should the expulsions go ahead, it will be the one of the largest incidents of ethnic cleansing in the area since 1967.

Historic pro-Palestine motion passes in University of Melbourne Student Union
Melbourne Uni pro-Palestine motion
Emma Dynes and Bella Beiraghi

The University of Melbourne Student Union (UMSU) student council has passed a historic motion in support of Palestine. The motion, “UMSU stands with Palestine—BDS and Solidarity Policy”, was moved by people of colour officer Hiba Adam and seconded by POC council representative Mohamed Hadi.

Global military spending reaches record high
Global military spending record
Robert Narai

World military spending has passed US$2 trillion for the first time, according to new data published by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). Last year was the seventh consecutive year that world military spending increased; total expenditure has almost doubled this century.

Luxemburg on imperialism and war
Rick Kuhn

From early in her political career, Rosa Luxemburg was concerned with the struggle against imperialism and war. Her analysis and the tactics she advocated weren’t all correct, but she was always on the side of the working class and its independent organisation, and of the oppressed. That was true in her approach to the “national question”, her responses to wars and her theory of imperialism.

Red lines and the Solomon Islands
Sam Pietsch

The Thin Red Line is a novel by James Jones set during the World War Two battle between the United States and Japan for control of the Solomon Islands. It is about the devastation war visits even on the “winners”; the title refers to the physical and mental fragility of human beings, which combat inevitably exposes with horrifying consequences. And it is about the hypocrisy and callousness of those who give the orders to fight without having to suffer those consequences.