We should not be lectured about sexism by Gillard
We should not be lectured about sexism by Gillard)

On the afternoon of 9 October 2012, then prime minister Julia Gillard famously declared in parliament, “I will not be lectured about sexism and misogyny by this man, I will not. Not now, not ever”. 

As “this man” was opposition leader and soon-to-be Prime Minister Tony Abbott, well known for his misogyny and an avatar for every misogynist most women had ever encountered, it’s no wonder the speech went viral.

At the tenth anniversary, recollections have been glowing. Labor Minister for the Environment Tanya Plibersek said, “I felt I was there while history was being made”. Zoe Daniels, a former ABC journalist and now a teal independent MP, summed up a lot of the speech’s appeal with, “There was a collective female head nod around the world”.

But these celebrations obscure a lot else that went on in parliament that day. Gillard is no doubt glad that her speech “has become divorced from [its] parliamentary context”, as she put it this week.

Gillard’s government rested on such a narrow and tenuous majority, and was reliant on ex-LNP MP Peter Slipper taking the speaker’s chair so that the outgoing Labor speaker could sit on the backbench and vote. When it was revealed that Slipper had sent numerous misogynist texts to a male staffer whom he was also alleged to have sexually harassed, Abbott took the opportunity to have Slipper removed as speaker. Not, of course, in order to make a stand against sexism, but in an effort to destabilise the Gillard government. And so it came to pass that, when Gillard rose to speak, it was to defend keeping Slipper as the speaker of parliament—a sordid attempt to hold on to power, whatever the message it might send. 

But this wasn’t the only aspect of the context that undermined Gillard’s anti-sexist credentials. There was also something much more central to the Gillard government’s service to Australian capitalism: neoliberal cuts to welfare, including those targeting women.

On the very day of the celebrated speech, the Gillard government passed a bill largely unnoticed by political commentators, the Social Security Legislation Amendment (Fair Incentives to Work) Act 2012. This legislation forced parenting payment recipients (who are mostly women) off their payment once their youngest child turned 6, in the case of partnered parents, or 8, in the case of single parents. Previously, parents had remained eligible for the payment until their youngest child turned 16, so this represented a major attack. Those forced off their payment would be moved onto Newstart, a much lower allowance. This affected roughly 163,000 single parents, and saved the government $728 million over the following four years.

Very little reference has been made to this in the week’s celebrations of Gillard’s speech. It has largely been swept under the carpet, as it was by Gillard at the time. Speaking on ABC Radio Adelaide on 11 October, she merely noted, “There are still barriers there—I mean, it’s not easy from the perspective of work and family life”.

Gillard in fact celebrated these attacks during her time in office. On the first anniversary of the bill’s passing, Gillard defended the changes that left single mothers, some of the poorest women in Australia, between $60 and $100 a week worse off. In the classic neoliberal-speak of the legislation’s title, “Fair Incentives to Work”, she spoke of helping women return to paid work.

One of the very few articles in the last week to mention this crime against working class and poor women was one by Margaret Ambrose in the Guardian on 5 October titled “Julia Gillard’s misogyny speech has empowered me—to speak up about her government’s shortcomings”. Mocking the articles praising Gillard, Ambrose writes, “I too remember exactly where I was when Gillard delivered her slap-down of the patriarchy. I was a sole-care single mother of two pre-schoolers, who had just discovered that in addition to having the full-time job of caring for small children, I was soon going to have to find a second one”.

Another who remembers where she was on that day is Terese Edwards, head of the National Council for Single Mothers and their Children. As Gillard delivered her misogyny speech, Edwards led a protest on the lawns of parliament against the welfare bill then passing through the Senate.

The 2018 Poverty in Australia report noted a sharp rise in poverty among households with sole parents who were without paid work over the two years following the speech, from 35 percent in 2013 to 59 percent in 2015. Currently, 37 percent of single-mother families are living in poverty. As far as Australia’s bosses are concerned, this represents mission accomplished, and roll on the stage 3 tax cuts for the rich. 

If you want to reminisce about the Labor government led by Australia’s only woman prime minister, remember this attack on women. It reveals the real nature of Gillard’s government (and Albanese’s today), far more than a few well-chosen barbs directed at Tony Abbott.

Read more
McGowan’s real legacy
Nick Everett

“I’m exhausted”, declared West Australian Premier Mark McGowan when announcing his resignation at a press conference on 29 May. So too are the state’s 40,000 nurses, who, under McGowan’s government, have confronted daily staff shortages, declining real wages and attacks on their union.

Canada's fossil fuelled catastrophe
Zak Borzovoy

Wildfires are tearing through the Canadian province of Alberta, the heart of Canada’s lucrative oil and gas industry. The images of orange and black skies from the thick smoke—which is now billowing across the US border, causing air quality warnings in several northern states—are dystopian yet familiar.

Jacky shines a light on racism and exploitation
Jacky shines a light
Sarah Garnham

You’re just a performing fucking monkey”. A racist barb, and one of many pointed moments in Jacky, a Melbourne Theatre Company production currently playing at the Arts Centre. Jacky is about the politics of performing monkeys. It is about racism and exploitation, hypocrisy and resistance.

Historic US university strike wins
Alexis Vassiley

Academic workers at Rutgers University in New Jersey have achieved a stunning victory with a serious campaign of industrial action, centred on an open-ended strike. Their approach is a model for unionists in Australia.

Why I’m voting No to Sydney Uni EA
Alma Torlakovic

NTEU Fightback, a rank-and-file union group of the National Tertiary Education Union at the University of Sydney, is calling on staff to vote No in the upcoming ballot on the proposed enterprise agreement. The campaign was launched at a forum on 25 May, attended by over 50 people. A members’ meeting on 13 June will consider the agreement. This week will probably be the first time that members are provided with a full list of proposed changes to our working conditions.