Witch hunt against Jake Lynch the latest attempt to silence pro-Palestine activists
Witch hunt against Jake Lynch the latest attempt to silence pro-Palestine activists
)

Sydney University associate professor Jake Lynch, an outspoken advocate of the BDS (boycott, divestment and sanctions) campaign against Israel, has again come under slanderous attack because of his views.

The latest lie against him – published at J-Wire, the ABC, the Australian Jewish News and repeated at the Daily Telegraph, among other outlets – relates to an event at which he was present last week. It was a lecture by colonel Richard Kemp, a retired British military officer who is an outspoken supporter of IDF military tactics as employed in Gaza and elsewhere.

I attended the event with others from Sydney Staff for BDS, a group of university staff who have been campaigning on the issue of Palestine within the university and in the campus union, the NTEU. We attended the event with the aim of holding up a banner, distributing leaflets and asking questions of the speaker. In addition, a separate protest by students who turned up to heckle the speaker also took place part-way through the lecture.

Sydney Staff for BDS did not organise the student demonstration. Nor is it true – as is suggested by the testimony of one attendee of the event – that the Socialist Alternative student club organised and participated in the demonstration. In fact none of them were present.

Those students who were present have every right to stage a peaceful protest and object to an apologist for Israeli war crimes.

The focus of supporters of Israel, however, is not on the students, but on demonising Jake Lynch. They are not giving a truthful account of events.

Video footage taken by those present clearly shows what actually happened, including security surrounding the students and trying to make them leave by physically pushing and shoving them.

Notably, most of the accounts fail to mention an older woman with reddish hair in the front row of the lecture theatre, who started throwing water onto the student protesters.

This woman was asked to stop by staff members in the audience including myself and Jake Lynch, as well as the students affected. She was told her actions amounted to assault. She continued, with security ignoring her actions. She then started to attack Jake Lynch.

I was sitting in the audience a few people away from Dr Annabel McGoldrick who works in the Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies. Annabel and the woman were exchanging words about the situation and the woman jumped out of her seat and proceeded to physically assault Annabel. I called out that this is assault, and this is documented in one of the videos. The video footage of the event also shows Jake telling the woman that he would sue her for assault.

At no point whatsoever did Jake Lynch do or say anything anti-Semitic. The accusation of anti-Semitism is a common slander used against pro-Palestine activists to discredit our movement and silence opposition to Israel’s actions. It is an old trick and has been used previously by countless Zionist lobby organisations such as Shurat HaDin – who incidentally had to drop their legal case against Lynch last year due to unsubstantiated claims.

Indeed, the accusation is so common that just days prior to the event, Sydney Staff for BDS had been planning a forum titled “Why BDS is not anti-Semitic”, with the aim of once again rebutting this argument.

The university has been called on to investigate accusations that Jake Lynch is guilty of anti-Semitism. There is a petition calling for him to be sacked. It is a disgraceful and cowardly act on the part of the Zionist lobby to ignore the actual, documented evidence of assault and violence against two university staff members by one of their own supporters, while calling for the sacking of an academic based on untrue and slanderous accusations.

[Alma Torlakovic is a member of the NTEU Branch Committee (USYD) and Sydney Staff for BDS.]

Read more
NT Intervention a racist disgrace
Kim Bullimore

Fifteen years ago, the John Howard federal Coalition government launched a military invasion and occupation of Aboriginal townships and lands in the Northern Territory. More than 600 military and police personnel, accompanied by a phalanx of government bureaucrats, entered 73 Aboriginal communities, placing them under the unilateral control of the Australian army.

‘Pregnant? Need help? Call Jane’
Shirley Killen

In the late 1960s, cryptic notes began to appear on poles and noticeboards around Chicago, directing women who were pregnant and in trouble to “call Jane”. The number provided connected them to the Jane Collective (officially the Abortion Counselling Service of Women’s Liberation), an underground network of activists providing illegal abortions in the years before the 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision. This collective is the subject of The Janes, a new HBO documentary directed by Emma Pildes and Tia Lessin.

Roe vs. Wade overturned: a hammer blow against women’s rights
Fight the US Supreme Court
Liz Ross

Around the US, tens of thousands have hit the streets slamming the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe vs. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision that established abortion as a right. In Manhattan, a large crowd of young, multiracial activists marched, chanting “Fuck the Supreme Court!”

A voice to parliament will do little for Indigenous justice
Voice to parliament will do little
Jordan Humphreys

Anthony Albanese started his victory speech on election night with a commitment that his government would implement the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full, beginning with a referendum to create an Indigenous Voice to Parliament in its first term.

Labor hires evil professor
Alex McAulay

When a new government is being formed, the appointment of senior bureaucrats to the public service often tells you as much about how the country will be run, and in whose interests, as does the allocation of ministries to politicians.

Julian Assange needs public support
Josh Lees

UK Home Secretary Priti Patel has approved the extradition of Julian Assange to the US, where he will face 18 espionage charges brought against him by the Department of Justice. The charges carry a combined penalty of up to 175 years in prison. It is another cut in the long, torturous crucifixion of the Wikileaks founder, who dared to embarrass and expose the war crimes of the US empire and its allies.