Why the Australian Refugee Council’s residency proposal should be opposed

The Refugee Council of Australia has put forward a proposal for refugees to pick fruit and vegetables as a path to secure permanent residence in Australia. Its plan is for the government to offer this scheme to the 17,000 people in Australia on temporary protection visas and safe haven enterprise visas, which currently offer them little prospect of residency and therefore a life in limbo.

This scheme should be opposed by all supporters of refugee rights. It just puts more pressure on already vulnerable people and takes no account of their rights. It has found support among the very politicians whose bipartisan anti-refugee policies created those inhuman temporary visas in the first place.

“I think they appeal to me because they’ve been here seven to nine years already”, Nationals MP Damian Drum said, according to the Sydney Morning Herald, “and we would know by now if they’re going to be unlawful in their day to day activities”.

Labor MP Julian Hill, again quoted by the Herald, was blunt about the economic motivations: “There’s a desperate need for warm human bodies prepared to work hard in the regions right now and for the next couple of years until the borders reopen properly”.

In other words, it is fine for refugees to rot in detention centres and then in the community for years with no rights and no certainty. But we can’t have Australia’s fruit and vegetable stock allowed to rot in the fields. An alternative supply of exploitable labour must be found to harvest it.

Suddenly, refugee bashers are interested in what refugees are doing with their lives—right at the point when harvests are due and there are tens of thousands fewer backpackers and temporary migrant workers in Australia. Their interest comes straight from a concern about profits—exactly the same concern responsible for the low wages, bullying and sexual harassment, and appalling living conditions that already characterise the fruit and vegetable industry and have done for decades.

Bonded labour schemes like this, with their medieval master-serf overtones, are mechanisms for increasing exploitation and reducing workers’ ability to resist it. They need to be opposed.

We already know what abuses bonded labour schemes produce from the experience of migrant workers on temporary work visas. According to a Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) investigator in 2018: “In some cases, the FWO encountered situations where a person is virtually bonded like a slave to a particular [labour hire] provider, on the basis they have been told they won't have their visa extension signed unless they see out the season with them”.

For something far less fundamental than the right to safe and secure residency, backpackers on working holiday visas have put up with abuses to meet the requirements of the scheme and stay in the country. The same FWO official reported: “We saw backpackers being lured to regional centres by dodgy labour hire operators, treating them poorly, bullying and sexually harassing them and ripping them off to the tune of hundreds—and sometimes thousands—of dollars per person”.

Human rights are just that—rights. They should not be dependent on someone’s capacity to generate profits for a boss. To “ask desperate people to pick fruit for their freedom”, as Shirley Jackson put it in the Guardian, negates the very concept of freedom.

It says a lot about how appalling the existing visa conditions are that a refugee might consider taking this on. A choice between forced labour as the only path to a safe and secure life, or returning to persecution and danger in their original country, is not a real choice.

Temporary protection visas and safe haven enterprise visas are disgraceful. All those who languish in the limbo created by these visas deserve permanent residency. Permanent protection is what we need to fight for, not schemes through which refugees gain their rights only when it suits the needs of capitalism.

Read more
NSW teachers strike to end pay cap
A New South Wales Teachers Federation member

“On the day of my mother’s funeral, I went home and wrote reports”, Kate says. She’s a public high school teacher and, along with 50,000 others, many also from Catholic schools, she’s striking to demand better pay and reduced workloads from the New South Wales government.

NSW nurses reject pay cut
A NSW Nurses and Midwives’ Association member

Nurses and midwives in New South Wales have rejected the state government’s insulting offer of a 3 percent pay rise in a combative, all-membership meeting at Sydney’s Town Hall. 

The racist disgrace of the Northern Territory Intervention
NT Intervention a racist disgrace
Kim Bullimore

Fifteen years ago, the John Howard federal Coalition government launched a military invasion and occupation of Aboriginal townships and lands in the Northern Territory. More than 600 military and police personnel, accompanied by a phalanx of government bureaucrats, entered 73 Aboriginal communities, placing them under the unilateral control of the Australian army.

Roe vs. Wade overturned: a hammer blow against women’s rights
Fight the US Supreme Court
Liz Ross

Around the US, tens of thousands have hit the streets slamming the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe vs. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision that established abortion as a right. In Manhattan, a large crowd of young, multiracial activists marched, chanting “Fuck the Supreme Court!”

‘Pregnant? Need help? Call Jane’
Shirley Killen

In the late 1960s, cryptic notes began to appear on poles and noticeboards around Chicago, directing women who were pregnant and in trouble to “call Jane”. The number provided connected them to the Jane Collective (officially the Abortion Counselling Service of Women’s Liberation), an underground network of activists providing illegal abortions in the years before the 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision. This collective is the subject of The Janes, a new HBO documentary directed by Emma Pildes and Tia Lessin.

Voice to parliament will do little
Jordan Humphreys

Anthony Albanese started his victory speech on election night with a commitment that his government would implement the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full, beginning with a referendum to create an Indigenous Voice to Parliament in its first term.