The Students for Palestine club at the University of New South Wales has been suspended. This is just the latest in a wave of attacks on Palestine solidarity activists across the country.
Arc, the body that oversees clubs and student life at UNSW, accused the Students for Palestine club of breaching campus policy by putting up posters, hanging banners, running stalls without bookings and allegedly harassing students by leafleting and making announcements in lectures. While these activities are simply the bread and butter of building any sort of activist life on campus, Arc outrageously claims that they harm the “psychosocial safety” of students. 
In a meeting with club members, Arc representatives objected to our use of the word genocide in promotional material or protest speeches, suggesting that it may be offensive to some students. This is like saying it would have been wrong to criticise apartheid South Africa in the 1980s because students who supported that regime would find it upsetting. 
The suspension follows a historic student general meeting organised by Students for Palestine, which was the largest Palestine solidarity event ever to take place at UNSW. More than 600 students voted to oppose the university’s ties to weapons companies and the genocide in Gaza. 
The suspension will be reviewed in January 2025 but is unlikely to be lifted as Arc has stated that more allegations against the club are still being investigated. It seems likely that university management played a hand in the suspension. Disciplinary proceedings were initiated by Arc shortly after management sent an email alerting students and staff to alleged breaches of the student code of conduct at the student general meeting. Arc staff have also indicated to us that university executives have taken an interest in the suspension case. 
This is an attack on the ability of students to organise a Palestine solidarity campaign on campus. Recently, the university banned a speak-out to commemorate one year of the genocide in Gaza. Despite this, students at UNSW are determined to continue the fight to oppose our university’s ties to this genocide. No matter what the university accuses us of, we know we are on the right side of history—and we will not be silenced.

Emma Terry

Palestine solidarity club suspended at UNSW

In one of the biggest ever events in solidarity with Palestine at the University of New South Wales, more than 600 students voted for a free Palestine and for our university to cut ties with the weapons industry at a student general meeting on Wednesday, 25 September. 
UNSW has $2.97 million in investments in, and does research for, weapons companies including Lockheed Martin, Boeing and Northrop Grumman. One research partnership is developing control systems with Lockheed Martin for their catastrophic hypersonic missiles. 
For weeks, pro-Israel students tried to convince people to vote against supporting Palestine. They ran stalls and put up posters asking students: “What are you voting for in the SGM? Against peace for all? More antisemitism on campus? Supporting terrorism?”. Despite this, only seventeen students voted against the motion. 
Four of them also spoke against it. Their arguments included accusations of supporting terrorism, and that the pro-Palestine movement is making Jewish students unsafe on campus. The vice-president of the Australian Union of Jewish Students said the meeting was useless, a “flash in the pan” that would help no-one. 
But this meeting, like all the other student general meetings that have taken place across the country in recent months, did mean something. They are drawing thousands of students into the Palestine solidarity movement and putting pressure on our universities not to remain complicit in genocide.
In 2020, when I first got involved with Palestine solidarity activism on campus, the situation was very different. Campus rallies were lucky to attract more than 50 people. Most students I spoke to were hesitant to express an opinion on Palestine, citing the complexity of the issue and their lack of knowledge.
Much has changed since last October. Many young people now support Palestine, and campus solidarity actions are bigger than ever. The student general meeting both reflects this reality and has helped to win over more people.
The campaign in the lead-up to the meeting drew in students who were new to activism. While building the event, they have become steeled in their support for Palestine and gained confidence to convince others that if they care about the issue, they must do something about it. On the day of the general meeting, one student who had never been to a protest and had never handed out a leaflet admitted how nervous and unsure they were about talking to other students. By the end of the night, they were on a megaphone urging people to join the meeting and vote for Palestine. 
From the Vietnam War to South African apartheid, history has shown that we can win when we protest in our thousands and force those with power to accede to our demands. It’s going to take a mass movement on the streets, in our workplaces and on our campuses to make our governments and universities cut ties with Israel. UNSW Students for Palestine are proud to have contributed another step towards that goal.

Largest ever mobilisation for Palestine at UNSW

Recent research published by Sydney’s Westmead Children’s Hospital is being weaponised by anti-trans activists to argue against the use of gender affirming medical care for trans youth. 
The <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-11/blocked:-the-battle-over-youth-gender-care/102587506">ABC’s Four Corners</a> program reported in July that the Westmead gender clinic is severely understaffed and has only admitted three patients this year (compared to 88 in 2022), while the waitlist has blown out to 115 people. The ABC alleged that staff members had left due to the implications of the controversial study, which did not involve current frontline staff from the gender clinic, and that they felt they were no longer able to provide the care they knew their patients needed.
The study, which argues against recommending medical transition to transgender youth, followed the transition process of 79 patients. It asserts that young people primarily identify as trans due to family trauma and “rapid onset gender dysphoria” (ROGD). Proponents of ROGD claim that gender dysphoria is caused by social influences, such as social media, during adolescence and that this newly adopted gender identity will not last into adulthood. 
This is a contested concept that, according to the Australian Psychological Society, empirical evidence refutes. For instance, a recent study in the Journal of Adolescent Health showed that nearly two-thirds of trans and gender diverse people realise their gender does not match the sex they were assigned at birth at or before the age of ten. The implications of ROGD are that trans youth should not have access to gender affirming care because they will “grow out” of their gender dysphoria. Many conservative lawmakers in the United States have referenced it when banning hormone therapy and puberty blockers for trans people.
The report bases its stance towards gender affirming medical care on its warning that “for young people who may regret their choice ... the risks for potential harm are significant”. It claims that 22 percent of participants detransitioned, meaning that they no longer identified as trans. 
However, The Australian Professional Association for Trans Health (AusPATH) said in a <a href="https://auspath.org.au/2023/03/01/auspath-response-to-elkadi-j-chudleigh-c-maguire-a-m-ambler-g-r-schers-kozlowska-k-developmental-pathway-choices-of-young-people-presenting-to-a-gender-service-with-gender-distre/">response</a> to the report that the figure includes patients who were not diagnosed with gender dysphoria and thus were never offered medical care. A few patients chose to stop taking puberty blockers, but there is no evidence that suggests they were no longer trans (some trans people pursue medical intervention, others do not). Only one patient in the study stopped all treatment and assumed their gender assigned at birth.
AusPATH claims that there is significant bias in the Westmead research, pointing out that the authors credit the National Association of Practising Psychiatrists, an organisation with known links to the anti-trans movement whose current president has presented anti-gender affirming talks to groups such as the conservative Australian Christian Lobby. 
The report claims that doctors are pressured to “compromise their own ethical standards” by providing gender affirming medical care, and recommends a more “holistic” approach to treatment. Anti-trans activists and professionals regularly call for alternative forms of care, such as “watchful waiting”, which asserts that psychotherapy and the passage of time will resolve adolescent gender issues. These include Dr Jillian Spencer, a senior child psychiatrist recently suspended from the Queensland Children’s Hospital after speaking at an event held by anti-trans activist Posie Parker, and psychologist Dianna Kenny, an ambassador for the anti-LGBTI lobby group Binary Australia—both featured on the Four Corners program.
There is no evidence to back up the claim that “watchful waiting” is a legitimate alternative to affirmative care, and AusPATH likens these practices to conversion therapy under a different name. 
According to the ABC, Westmead de-prioritises children who have advanced into puberty, unlike the gender clinics in Queensland, Melbourne and Perth. It has also been reluctant to prescribe hormone treatment for those under the age of eighteen, meaning parents are forced to find expensive private treatment for their children’s transition. 
One former Westmead staff member told Four Corners that she quit after the death of fourteen-year-old trans boy Noah O’Brien. Noah, who had already begun puberty, was pushed to the bottom of the clinic’s list. His mum insisted that he developed a severe eating disorder due to the stress of not being able to begin gender affirming medical care. While in hospital, a social worker recommended he see a gender specialist, but this request was denied. He took his own life in January. 
Westmead’s report has been released in the context of a global assault on trans rights. A key plank of the anti-trans assault is the claim that gender affirming medical care for young people amounts to child abuse. More than twenty US states have banned this care, while Sweden, Norway and the UK have wound back the use of puberty blockers.
There was a backlash against the Four Corners program from the right-wing media and known transphobes, including Dr Spencer. However, the NSW government issued a statement the day after it was aired expressing its dissatisfaction with the level of care being provided for trans youth at Westmead. NSW Health Minister Ryan Park has commissioned a review into the way in which gender affirming care is administered across the state, and promised to expedite the completion of a new gender hub for under 25-year-olds in south-east Sydney that has stalled for the last two years.
This is a reminder that anti-trans politics is still on the fringe in Australia. But this should not be taken for granted. The backlash in the US had a rapid onset, and the Westmead research shows that transphobes exist not just in the organised far-right, but in the medical profession as well.

Palestine solidarity club suspended at UNSW

Largest ever mobilisation for Palestine at UNSW

Westmead Children’s Hospital publishes anti-trans research

Other Media

Shop

Manage Your Subscription

Contact Us